PocketSmith for advisers:
the UK alternative.

Where PocketSmith genuinely shines

Credit where due. PocketSmith has been refining personal finance software since 2008, and three things stand out for adviser use.

Calendar-based forecasting. PocketSmith's core idea — projecting balances forward from scheduled income and expenses on a calendar — is genuinely useful for clients managing lumpy cashflow, and there's nothing quite like it in most consumer apps.

Deep manual control. Power users can categorise, split, tag and annotate to their heart's content. For the minority of clients who enjoy maintaining their finances in detail, it rewards the effort.

It exists for advisers today. PocketSmith has actively courted adviser use, and firms have built real client workflows on it. If your firm needs a working client-data tool this quarter, that maturity counts — and we'd be misleading you to pretend otherwise.

Where the UK friction bites

Bank connectivity is the big one. PocketSmith is built from New Zealand for a global market, and UK bank feeds run through international third-party aggregation. That layer works, but it's a different proposition from a native UK Open Banking relationship: connection reliability varies by bank, and the consent chain runs through an additional overseas intermediary that firms may need to explain in their client data-privacy story. earmarkIQ's connections run through Finexer, an FCA-authorised UK Open Banking provider, under the UK's Account Information Services framework — the same regulatory plumbing as UK banking apps, with earmarkIQ operating as an FCA Appointed Representative of Finexer.

Categorisation effort sits with the client. PocketSmith's depth comes with a setup and maintenance burden — and the clients whose expenditure data advisers most need are rarely the clients who enjoy maintaining category rules. earmarkIQ categorises automatically with AI transaction classification; the client's job is to connect their banks, which takes minutes per account.

Categories aren't UK-planning-shaped. A generic global category tree leaves the adviser (or paraplanner) remapping data before it fits a Voyant or CashCalc expenditure screen. The category-level exports earmarkIQ is building are designed for exactly those screens — that mapping is the point of the product, not an afterthought. The wider argument for real data over questionnaires is covered in how advisers collect expenditure data (and why it breaks).

The honest comparison table

Which should a UK firm choose?

Choose PocketSmith if you need working adviser access to client spending data now, your clients are willing to maintain their categorisation, and an aggregated (rather than native UK Open Banking) connection chain fits your data governance story.

Line up earmarkIQ if your priority is UK-native Open Banking depth, zero-maintenance categorisation for clients, and exports built for the cashflow tools UK firms actually model in. The realistic path: clients connect now, grant consent, and the firm exports categorised expenditure straight away — joining the pilot to shape what ships next.

Whichever tool you choose: three adoption lessons

Client adoption is the whole game. The best data tool is the one clients actually connect to and keep connected. In practice that favours whichever option asks the least of the client: one connection ceremony per bank, then nothing. Every recurring task you add — categorising, tagging, confirming rules — loses a percentage of clients each month, and the clients you lose first are the ones whose data you most needed.

Introduce it as part of the service, not homework. Firms that get high connection rates present data collection as how the firm works ("we plan from your real numbers — here's the app we use for that") rather than as an optional extra. Building the connection step into onboarding, with the adviser present, beats a follow-up email every time.

Mind the consent renewal rhythm. UK Open Banking consent typically needs reconfirming every 90 days. Whichever tool you adopt, fold the renewal prompt into your existing client contact rhythm so connections don't quietly lapse between reviews — a lapsed connection discovered at the annual review is a hole in exactly the data you were counting on.

FAQ